Posts: 378
Threads: 28
Joined: Mar 2007
Reputation:
5
Well.....I've been waiting to hear what the price would be, always liked the max................but......$30,000

They have got to be kidding
Bought this instead....[attachment=3637]
Never ride the A model of anything.
sounds like a f*(&ing rocket alright.
Posts: 98
Threads: 7
Joined: Jul 2007
Reputation:
0
I had a look/sit on one at the press launch the other day. I always liked the old Vmax, and dont mind the new one. Cant wait to ride one. Its got everything but the kitchen sink on it.
Few points I dont like about it:
18'" wheels
Shaft Drive means gearing changes wont be easy.
and although its got a claimed 200 odd hp, it also has a claimed 310kgs of weight!
Price! 30k, could almost buy a Busa AND a B-King.
Posts: 133
Threads: 9
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation:
0
I agree with davegc.
B-King and Busa. Second-hand, you'd still have a few bob in the pocket to have fun with.
Posts: 5,303
Threads: 275
Joined: Mar 2007
Reputation:
9
The new Triumph Thunderbird looks like it will be a true grunt machine too!
1600 twin watercooled with belt drive.
[attachment=3651]
"If time catches up with you. You're going too slow!"
Regards BUSGO
Posts: 888
Threads: 54
Joined: Jul 2007
Reputation:
0
I wouldn't own another shaft drive bike. I found that it felt as though it wanted to pickup then dump the rear wheel under full throttle in tight bends.
Something I read "But the V-Max also weighs 307 kilos – 47kg more than the B-King – which somewhat negates its almost 40bhp power advantage over the Suzuki."
I presume the B-King would make a better canyon carver.
I like the styling of the V-Max, but the B-King has an aggressive look that I think can be very easily made to be one of the best looking bikes around - in my eye at least.
Licence Back!