Of course don't take everything you read on the net as fact. Things are never quite so simple.
Her statements to me are very divisive and can only inflame things.
We need to work together to solve the problems and get rid of these extremists, on both sides I might add!
Stats can be interpreted and played with so easily, the Pollies do it daily.
Still I share the concern with you Ray.
A quick search found this...
Re that video...
The claim is, at best, very poorly stated. No external sources are necessary to prove this. Consider the following quotes from the article:
There are 1.2 billion Muslims in the world today. Of course not all of them are radicals. The majority of them are peaceful people. The radicals are estimated to be between 15-25% according to all intelligence services around the world.
The claimant is drawing a line between "peaceful" Muslims and "radical" Muslims, claiming that 15-25% are radicals, while the others are peaceful.
This is re-enforced two paragraphs later:
"So why should we worry about the radical 15-25%? Because it is the radicals that kill. Because it is the radicals that behead and massacre," Gabriel said.
So the claim is that 15-25% of 1.2 billion Muslims participate in beheadings and massacres. That's 180,000,000 - 300,000,000 Muslims who are supposedly involved in beheadings and massacres.
Unless we are going to assume a huge media cover-up of Muslim-initiated beheadings and massacres, there simply are not enough beheadings and massacres to involve that many perpetrators.
Although that doesn't mean there's not some element of truth to such a claim--it only means the claim is made in very sloppy terms.
and...
The key problem in the original statement is the not-so-subtle indication that fundamentalists are all potentially violent terrorists, but that's not how it goes. By the same definition a Catholic nun is probably a Catholic fundamentalist, but not necessarily a commando-style terrorist!
Source:
http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questi...m-populati