Next Stimulus payment!

[Louwai]

Hi there

I'm $22K out of pocket because the ex hid his $180K redundancy, then has gone on the dole. Before you all take his side, you would be pleased to know that he is a woman basher (experienced that first hand), and kiddy fiddled his own child during a contact visit!

C$A are not interested in chasing the money because of his "low income". In his own evidence he has stated that he spends $10K a month on himself.

BB have you gone through a legal settlement with your ex???
If so, did he "hide" ANYTHING during the legal procedure??
Anyone (male or female) can go back to their previous partner for another bite at the cherrie regarding legal settlement, at any time. Many people think that once3 it's done the first time, that's it. But not true. There is no legal reason why anyone can't go back & try again for another lot.

If full disclosure was followed during the first legal settlement then any further attempts are pretty futile, BUT, if non-disclosure can be proven the judges come down pretty hard on those doing the hiding & will often award well in excess of the typical % split. In some cases up tp 95% - 5% in favour of the person claiming.

Cheers, B

[Troppo]

Proved by whom?

Do you have a reference for this?

Proven by the FDR Government's disastrous "New Deal" policies.

References? - Try any history book on the subject.

FDR's accelerated defence spending pre WW2 actually hastened the end of the depression by stimulating the economy.

Labor's stimulus package (the whole thing, not just the 'plasma bonus') spared Australia from the worst of the GFC.

[dddd]

.

Labor's stimulus package (the whole thing, not just the 'plasma bonus') spared Australia from the worst of the GFC.


Yep that's surely what we're suppose to believe no doubt about it.
Had absolutely nothing to do with the 12 years of sound government policy prior, getting rid of the Hawke, Keating 90 billion debt and in fact adding a 40 b surplus never helped, no way.

Also getting Australian companies more competitive on the global market (work choices amongst other reforms ie the warfies) couldn't have possibly helped one bit, no I'm sure it was the billions in hand out cheques so the average half wit can piss it up the wall at the local pub.

Not to forget the Chinese bats in the roofs, that's gotta help.

I think, it was Israel some years ago during a recession, the government built a massive hydroponics farm in the desert, today it's one of the country's largest money earners. But perhaps their government missed the point entirely, I'm sure it would have been far, far more popular to post out cheques to everyone and to hell with the future, let's just get voted back in.

[jamdonut]

Yeah its a big worry what is being done to this country and its money issues / how it is being spent, and the fact this stupid government allows our land to be sold to to overseas markets, Victorian farmland. ffs.

[Troppo]

.

Labor's stimulus package (the whole thing, not just the 'plasma bonus') spared Australia from the worst of the GFC.


Yep that's surely what we're suppose to believe no doubt about it.
Had absolutely nothing to do with the 12 years of sound government policy prior, getting rid of the Hawke, Keating 90 billion debt and in fact adding a 40 b surplus never helped, no way.

Also getting Australian companies more competitive on the global market (work choices amongst other reforms ie the warfies) couldn't have possibly helped one bit, no I'm sure it was the billions in hand out cheques so the average half wit can piss it up the wall at the local pub.

Not to forget the Chinese bats in the roofs, that's gotta help.

I think, it was Israel some years ago during a recession, the government built a massive hydroponics farm in the desert, today it's one of the country's largest money earners. But perhaps their government missed the point entirely, I'm sure it would have been far, far more popular to post out cheques to everyone and to hell with the future, let's just get voted back in.

Calm down.

Of course if it wasn't for Howard/Costello's surplus, Labor wouldn't have been able to stimulate the economy.

There is no disputing that.

Even your mate Tony Abbott and that fat pretentious blowhard Hockey agree that the stimulus insulated us from the ravages of the GFC. Of course, our terms of trade position didn't hurt either.

If Malcolm Turnbull hadn't been knifed, he would now be PM, with a clear majority (and I would have voted for him). Abbott polarises people. Clearly more hate him than like him. If he was any good, he would be PM.

Gillard has turned out to be a serious disappointment. All words, and no action. Keeping that control freak Rudd as foreign minister removes any credibility she may have had.

Her statements on Assange are a national embarrassment. About the only good thing they have done is the NBN.

[1300hayabusa]

I'm a bit confused as to who or what is too blame,labour is spending money(right/wrong) that the liberal party left in the coffers.....true......BUT.....the only reason that there is or was any money is because it came from
1:....."we will not implement the GST" anyone remember that????????
2:they did nothing in the country,infrastructure and roads where left in a disaster state
3:free reign to the banks and insurance who in return screwed the middle class side ways
4:big business's where given the scepter to stick it to any employee .....just to mention a few!!!!
Anyone here remember what happened when good old dipshit Jhonny lost the election??????............NOTHING......they all fell apart,Costello wanted to be in charge without getting voted in or being wanted and the rest just sat back and watched it all go to shit.I dont condone nor agree with halve the shit this gov is doing but on the other hand i would not want a bible basher for a prime minister who cant even address an issue without sounding like an uneducated bush pig.Maybe one day you Aussies(not all) will realize that sitting on your buts screaming laid back,the Aussie way and she'l be right will not fix things unless you are more proactive and actually get involved in the way this country is run.The way the French deal with their pollys is an indication of what's needed here in the"lucky country"

[kawasuki]

.

Labor's stimulus package (the whole thing, not just the 'plasma bonus') spared Australia from the worst of the GFC.


Yep that's surely what we're suppose to believe no doubt about it.
Had absolutely nothing to do with the 12 years of sound government policy prior, getting rid of the Hawke, Keating 90 billion debt and in fact adding a 40 b surplus never helped, no way.

Also getting Australian companies more competitive on the global market (work choices amongst other reforms ie the warfies) couldn't have possibly helped one bit, no I'm sure it was the billions in hand out cheques so the average half wit can piss it up the wall at the local pub.

Not to forget the Chinese bats in the roofs, that's gotta help.

I think, it was Israel some years ago during a recession, the government built a massive hydroponics farm in the desert, today it's one of the country's largest money earners. But perhaps their government missed the point entirely, I'm sure it would have been far, far more popular to post out cheques to everyone and to hell with the future, let's just get voted back in.

Calm down.

Of course if it wasn't for Howard/Costello's surplus, Labor wouldn't have been able to stimulate the economy.

There is no disputing that.

Even your mate Tony Abbott and that fat pretentious blowhard Hockey agree that the stimulus insulated us from the ravages of the GFC. Of course, our terms of trade position didn't hurt either.

If Malcolm Turnbull hadn't been knifed, he would now be PM, with a clear majority (and I would have voted for him). Abbott polarises people. Clearly more hate him than like him. If he was any good, he would be PM.

Gillard has turned out to be a serious disappointment. All words, and no action. Keeping that control freak Rudd as foreign minister removes any credibility she may have had.

Her statements on Assange are a national embarrassment. About the only good thing they have done is the NBN.

"About the only good thing they have done is the NBN"

[GRUNTMAX]

[Louwai]

Dear Kawasuki,

Here's the duck's guts of the NBN . A total joke that your kids will still be paying for in 50years.

Have seen that one before Grunter... I have a good friend in Telstra who would not tell me crap.
His words are; "That description is crap". It contains some truths which are interwoven with mostly total crap.
Purely penned & distributed to instill distaste into the minds of those of us (the majority of the population) that have no clue as to how Fibre Optics actually works.

Having said that, please don't in any way think that I'm condoning the gov actoins.

B

[GRUNTMAX]

[dddd]

After I read the comment about the NBN being the only good thing the Govt. has undertaken, I threw my hands in the air and thought just give up. The phrase "can't see the forest for the trees" springs to mind.

But I will comment on one point of the NBN that people haven't picked up on at this stage. They have had to make changes to the Trade Practices Act to enable this deal to go through. They will have a total monopoly, every provider will have to go through the NBN. Putting this another way, we will have a communist govt. having total control (including its pricing and content) over this very important means of communication.

Secondly, when was the last time we had a govt. built and operated project that was more efficient and less costly to run than private enterprise could do? We only have to look at the BER to get a glimpse of what's going to happen. I honestly believe that this Labor govt. loves big projects like this so they can easily hide the grafts and kickbacks that surely must be coming back to them through the system i.e. school halls costing 3 times what private enterprise could build them for. Where do we really think that money's gone to?

---

Gruntmax

You left one out mate, Gillard before the election -we will not have a carbon tax, that promise lasted about 3 weeks.

[Aussie Steve]

Anybody who thinks politicians of whatever persausion having the best interests of the people who voted them in is a fool. The brave new Europe is a glaring example of this....so many gravy trains to ride on!!

[GRUNTMAX]

After I read the comment about the NBN being the only good thing the Govt. has undertaken, I threw my hands in the air and thought just give up. The phrase "can't see the forest for the trees" springs to mind.

But I will comment on one point of the NBN that people haven't picked up on at this stage. They have had to make changes to the Trade Practices Act to enable this deal to go through. They will have a total monopoly, every provider will have to go through the NBN. Putting this another way, we will have a communist govt. having total control (including its pricing and content) over this very important means of communication.

Secondly, when was the last time we had a govt. built and operated project that was more efficient and less costly to run than private enterprise could do? We only have to look at the BER to get a glimpse of what's going to happen. I honestly believe that this Labor govt. loves big projects like this so they can easily hide the grafts and kickbacks that surely must be coming back to them through the system i.e. school halls costing 3 times what private enterprise could build them for. Where do we really think that money's gone to?

---

Gruntmax

You left one out mate, Gillard before the election -we will not have a carbon tax, that promise lasted about 3 weeks.

That was written before the bitch shafted Crudd I think.-----------------------------and the list grows

[bioDog]

[quote='dddd' pid='233008' dateline='1292995322']
After I read the comment about the NBN being the only good thing the Govt. has undertaken, I threw my hands in the air and thought just give up. The phrase "can't see the forest for the trees" springs to mind.

But I will comment on one point of the NBN that people haven't picked up on at this stage. They have had to make changes to the Trade Practices Act to enable this deal to go through. They will have a total monopoly, every provider will have to go through the NBN. Putting this another way, we will have a communist govt. having total control (including its pricing and content) over this very important means of communication.

Didnt we have just one government owned telocomminication company called telecom that had a monopoly on the marketplace. This became telstra wich we owned and then was sold back to mum and dad investors by your good mates the liberals.

[Louwai]

Didnt we have just one government owned telocomminication company called telecom that had a monopoly on the marketplace. This became telstra wich we owned and then was sold back to mum and dad investors by your good mates the liberals.

Yes that's true. After the T3 sell off there was 17% of Telstra still belonging to the Gov.
The 17% remainder of Telstra was placed in Australia's Future Fund, which will provide superannuation and pensions for Australia's public servants.

In 2009 (Labour gov) the Future Fund sold off another $2.4B worth of shares reducing the government's stake in Telstra to 10.9%.

Good to see the Gov is planning for the future of all the Public Servants.