Aerodynamics
|
Aerodynamics
|
16-03-2014, 09:17pm
In the days of the Triumph Bonneville (the original that is) it was reckoned that 45 hp (probably around 39 kilo-watts) was required to achieve the 'ton' a.k.a 100 mph or 160 kph. However, around the same time, diminutive dings on tiny 125 or even 50cc bikes were achieving the same sort of speed on a lot less horse power. I guess that was aerodynamics......
Government certified carpet muncher
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Aerodynamics - by Heezus - 02-03-2014, 04:35pm
RE: Aerodynamics - by Corpsedealer - 02-03-2014, 05:24pm
RE: Aerodynamics - by Belzybob - 02-03-2014, 11:01pm
RE: Aerodynamics - by Kendo - 03-03-2014, 08:44am
RE: Aerodynamics - by Batfink - 02-03-2014, 05:31pm
RE: Aerodynamics - by mozzie26 - 02-03-2014, 07:09pm
RE: Aerodynamics - by Dale - 03-03-2014, 08:55am
RE: Aerodynamics - by Batfink - 03-03-2014, 09:02am
RE: Aerodynamics - by DjPete - 03-03-2014, 09:28am
RE: Aerodynamics - by PostmanPete - 03-03-2014, 10:25am
RE: Aerodynamics - by Batfink - 03-03-2014, 10:26am
RE: Aerodynamics - by kev11e - 03-03-2014, 10:47am
RE: Aerodynamics - by Batfink - 03-03-2014, 10:51am
RE: Aerodynamics - by bear - 03-03-2014, 10:22pm
RE: Aerodynamics - by jamie - 07-03-2014, 01:49pm
RE: Aerodynamics - by Rev004 - 09-03-2014, 06:18pm
RE: Aerodynamics - by Maj - 10-03-2014, 08:48am
RE: Aerodynamics - by jamdonut - 12-03-2014, 06:59pm
RE: Aerodynamics - by Thompy - 15-03-2014, 06:38pm
RE: Aerodynamics - by Batfink - 16-03-2014, 06:47pm
RE: Aerodynamics - by Belzybob - 16-03-2014, 09:17pm
RE: Aerodynamics - by revhead - 16-03-2014, 09:49pm
RE: Aerodynamics - by Aussie Steve - 17-03-2014, 12:37pm
RE: Aerodynamics - by Thompy - 18-03-2014, 07:20pm
RE: Aerodynamics - by Aussie Steve - 18-03-2014, 08:47pm
|
Contact Us
