double standard
#6
Ok lets clarify some issues first.

If you ride a busa and you are a retailer or importer of motorbike related items of interest to our members we have always welcomed those retailers/importers to advertise FREE of charge but in our VENDORS section alone and not touting for business anywhere else in other threads. Coz thats what the Vendors section is for.

Now if you dont ride a busa but a postie or whatever bike or dont ride at all, but you have a business in motorbike items of interest to our members they are still welcome to advertise FREE of charge in our Vendors section. In other words you dont have to be riding a busa or anything else for that matter. Why? coz the items available to our members is what is of interest not the person selling it.

If however you have someone who spams mobile phones or whatever item not related to the motorbike industry and posts, his post is deleted and the poster banned. We dont tolerate spammers. If however you are a member of standing and run a business of sorts that member may post his link in LINKS Section offering his services but not if that was the sole reason he joined up on the forum, if so he would be viewed as a spammer.

Now onto that particular poster from AMC. You may take umbarage at competition nevertheless competition is encouraged only to benefit the end user. AMC has supplied us in the past with a group buy on Scorpio Alarms, they have taken orders for GI Pro units from members and are basically an assett to our membership with additional discounts offereed to our forum members. And he and others like Powerbronze are welcomed to advertise their services or wares to our membership without having to have to ride a busa or any bike for that matter, as long as its in the Vendors section. To date I have not seen this privilidge being abused. If that causes friction due to competition well Im afraid thats called a free market economy and not state based communist monopolies.

I think I have been fair here and am only pointing out policy that we have adhered to for quite some many years. If you feel I have been wrong on this by all means point it out.
[Image: SigPic100.jpg] Copper/Silver - The original, the rest are just copies.


Messages In This Thread
double standard - by spamanglenn - 08-08-2009, 07:44pm
RE: double standard - by big kev - 08-08-2009, 07:54pm
RE: double standard - by ROD - 08-08-2009, 08:18pm
RE: double standard - by pan - 08-08-2009, 08:34pm
RE: double standard - by TimF - 08-08-2009, 08:25pm
RE: double standard - by Volvi - 08-08-2009, 10:05pm
RE: double standard - by spamanglenn - 08-08-2009, 11:09pm
RE: double standard - by BLACKZOOK - 08-08-2009, 11:26pm
RE: double standard - by Volvi - 09-08-2009, 12:01am
RE: double standard - by BLACKZOOK - 09-08-2009, 12:19am
RE: double standard - by spamanglenn - 09-08-2009, 08:55am
RE: double standard - by Madmax - 11-08-2009, 03:54pm
RE: double standard - by Hutch99 - 09-08-2009, 09:48am
RE: double standard - by Stuntrider666 - 10-08-2009, 07:48am
RE: double standard - by 1300hayabusa - 11-08-2009, 07:49am
RE: double standard - by kawasuki - 11-08-2009, 04:07pm
RE: double standard - by Madmax - 12-08-2009, 02:53pm
RE: double standard - by Volvi - 12-08-2009, 04:56pm
RE: double standard - by kawasuki - 12-08-2009, 05:25pm
RE: double standard - by Volvi - 12-08-2009, 07:10pm
RE: double standard - by Rev - 12-08-2009, 11:40am
RE: double standard - by cheeky - 12-08-2009, 02:02pm
RE: double standard - by big kev - 12-08-2009, 02:23pm
RE: double standard - by Resn8 - 12-08-2009, 02:26pm
RE: double standard - by big kev - 12-08-2009, 02:44pm
RE: double standard - by cheeky - 12-08-2009, 07:00pm
RE: double standard - by ROD - 12-08-2009, 07:29pm
RE: double standard - by cheeky - 12-08-2009, 07:51pm
RE: double standard - by kawasuki - 12-08-2009, 09:58pm
RE: double standard - by pan - 12-08-2009, 10:33pm
RE: double standard - by 1hotbusa - 13-08-2009, 12:36pm
RE: double standard - by kawasuki - 13-08-2009, 12:39pm
RE: double standard - by spamanglenn - 12-08-2009, 11:17pm
RE: double standard - by 1300hayabusa - 13-08-2009, 08:20am
RE: double standard - by kawasuki - 13-08-2009, 08:39am
RE: double standard - by cheeky - 13-08-2009, 02:06pm
RE: double standard - by BUSGO - 13-08-2009, 04:23pm
RE: double standard - by kawasuki - 13-08-2009, 05:41pm
RE: double standard - by spamanglenn - 13-08-2009, 07:08pm
RE: double standard - by BUSGO - 13-08-2009, 07:39pm
RE: double standard - by ohdear - 13-08-2009, 07:57pm
RE: double standard - by Volvi - 13-08-2009, 08:24pm
RE: double standard - by DjPete - 13-08-2009, 09:24pm
RE: double standard - by kawasuki - 13-08-2009, 10:05pm
RE: double standard - by bioDog - 13-08-2009, 08:31pm
RE: double standard - by cheeky - 13-08-2009, 08:59pm
RE: double standard - by Volvi - 13-08-2009, 09:09pm
RE: double standard - by cheeky - 13-08-2009, 09:21pm
RE: double standard - by cheeky - 13-08-2009, 10:43pm
RE: double standard - by kawasuki - 13-08-2009, 10:54pm
RE: double standard - by Volvi - 13-08-2009, 10:56pm
RE: double standard - by pan - 13-08-2009, 11:13pm
RE: double standard - by Madmax - 13-08-2009, 11:34pm
RE: double standard - by ohdear - 13-08-2009, 11:38pm
RE: double standard - by Madmax - 14-08-2009, 12:16am
RE: double standard - by ohdear - 14-08-2009, 06:20am
RE: double standard - by kawasuki - 14-08-2009, 07:35am
RE: double standard - by ohdear - 14-08-2009, 07:47am
RE: double standard - by Madmax - 14-08-2009, 10:44am
RE: double standard - by 1300hayabusa - 14-08-2009, 06:39am
RE: double standard - by kawasuki - 13-08-2009, 10:59pm
RE: double standard - by ohdear - 13-08-2009, 11:32pm
RE: double standard - by big kev - 13-08-2009, 11:36pm
RE: double standard - by ohdear - 14-08-2009, 11:07am
RE: double standard - by Heidi1 - 14-08-2009, 11:22am
RE: double standard - by kawasuki - 14-08-2009, 05:52pm
RE: double standard - by bigfoot - 14-08-2009, 12:46pm



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)