SOFT CHILD PORN PICS GALLERY UPDATE
#3
1300hayabusa Wrote:The artist was not charged,given his photos back and allowed to display.So I reckon that the pics where not as pornographic as people made them out to be and to the eyes of the law they are fine?????????and still classified as art.
classic overreaction imo


Messages In This Thread
SOFT CHILD PORN PICS GALLERY UPDATE - by 1300hayabusa - 09-06-2008, 06:15am
RE: SOFT CHILD PORN PICS GALLERY UPDATE - by DjPete - 09-06-2008, 10:43am
RE: SOFT CHILD PORN PICS GALLERY UPDATE - by DjPete - 10-06-2008, 11:17am
RE: SOFT CHILD PORN PICS GALLERY UPDATE - by Heidi1 - 10-06-2008, 04:01pm
RE: SOFT CHILD PORN PICS GALLERY UPDATE - by DjPete - 10-06-2008, 04:30pm



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)