soft child porn promoted as ART by sydney gallery
#29
Very controversial situation.
I agree with those that don't tolerate child pornography.
I agree with those that think that naked human bodies are artistic.
I agree that underage children should not be used for any pornographic material.
I agree that pornographic material is extremely popular in the modern Australian culture.
I agree that child mollestors are the scum of the earth and should be treated as such.

I don't agree that every photograph of a naked child is pornographic, especially if they are not posed in a provocative manner.
I don't agree that children used in advertisement for clothes or products are being mollested.

BUT it appears that due to the intollerance of some and the depravity of some others, that the call has now gone out for the banning of advertisements of products that feature images of young children.

What is the world coming to?
"If time catches up with you. You're going too slow!"
Regards BUSGO
Reply


Messages In This Thread
soft child porn promoted as ART by sydney gallery - by jessie928 - 22-05-2008, 04:14pm
RE: soft child porn promoted as ART by sydney gallery - by jessie928 - 22-05-2008, 10:31pm
RE: soft child porn promoted as ART by sydney gallery - by jessie928 - 23-05-2008, 02:55pm
RE: soft child porn promoted as ART by sydney gallery - by BLACKZOOK - 23-05-2008, 08:36pm
RE: soft child porn promoted as ART by sydney gallery - by BLACKZOOK - 24-05-2008, 12:41am
RE: soft child porn promoted as ART by sydney gallery - by 1hotbusa - 26-05-2008, 07:29pm
RE: soft child porn promoted as ART by sydney gallery - by BUSGO - 26-05-2008, 05:57pm
RE: soft child porn promoted as ART by sydney gallery - by 1300hayabusa - 27-05-2008, 08:39pm
RE: soft child porn promoted as ART by sydney gallery - by 1300hayabusa - 27-05-2008, 09:24pm
RE: soft child porn promoted as ART by sydney gallery - by 1hotbusa - 27-05-2008, 09:58pm



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)