06-07-2001, 01:21pm
From another topic
James
Australian Club Member
(7/6/01 1:20:56 am)
------------------------------------------------------------
I noticed your comment on the getting the 1000 going and had a friend say he was told not to run Optimax in his GSXR1000. Only unleaded. Any update on this? and is the viscosity of the fuel an issue? Pretty f....n wicked bike!!
JP
Registered Guest
(7/6/01 8:58:00 am)
------------------------------------------------------------
I think all the manufacturers are having trouble with Optimax. The higher density is a good thing for cars as they are invariably set lean (emissions etc.). Optimax brings the air/fuel closer to the ideal - so, more horsepower.
Motorcycles, particularly Suzukis, are rich to begin with. Ask anyone who has spent some time with a dyno and air/fuel meter and they will tell you that standard bikes have to be leaned out to give maximum horsepower. Have you noticed that fitting an after market exhaust and/or air filter to the FI Suzukis improves them without remapping? The GSX-R1000 is rich throughout the range so anything that makes it richer i.e. Optimax, is not a good thing.
I would not recommend standard unleaded in the 1000. Fuel needs to be a minimum 96 octane.
The bottom line on Optimax is - a good fuel if, and only if, the fuel system (FI or carbs) are set-up for it.
demeester
Australian Club Member
(7/6/01 12:18:16 pm)
------------------------------------------------------------
Would you recommend, then, a standard unleaded with Octane booster added? James and I have both been told that the octane boosters added by most companies to achieve premium unleaded are dodgey to say the least, and that if stuck without Optimax available, use standard unleaded (and ride easy) rather than some of the othe premium unleaded's.
<i></i>
James
Australian Club Member
(7/6/01 1:20:56 am)
------------------------------------------------------------
I noticed your comment on the getting the 1000 going and had a friend say he was told not to run Optimax in his GSXR1000. Only unleaded. Any update on this? and is the viscosity of the fuel an issue? Pretty f....n wicked bike!!
JP
Registered Guest
(7/6/01 8:58:00 am)
------------------------------------------------------------
I think all the manufacturers are having trouble with Optimax. The higher density is a good thing for cars as they are invariably set lean (emissions etc.). Optimax brings the air/fuel closer to the ideal - so, more horsepower.
Motorcycles, particularly Suzukis, are rich to begin with. Ask anyone who has spent some time with a dyno and air/fuel meter and they will tell you that standard bikes have to be leaned out to give maximum horsepower. Have you noticed that fitting an after market exhaust and/or air filter to the FI Suzukis improves them without remapping? The GSX-R1000 is rich throughout the range so anything that makes it richer i.e. Optimax, is not a good thing.
I would not recommend standard unleaded in the 1000. Fuel needs to be a minimum 96 octane.
The bottom line on Optimax is - a good fuel if, and only if, the fuel system (FI or carbs) are set-up for it.
demeester
Australian Club Member
(7/6/01 12:18:16 pm)
------------------------------------------------------------
Would you recommend, then, a standard unleaded with Octane booster added? James and I have both been told that the octane boosters added by most companies to achieve premium unleaded are dodgey to say the least, and that if stuck without Optimax available, use standard unleaded (and ride easy) rather than some of the othe premium unleaded's.
<i></i>