Poll: are genII rear ends butt ugly?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
yes
29.55%
13 29.55%
no
70.45%
31 70.45%
Total 44 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

gen II rear end
#46
Just for a bit of fun....heres a cut and paste from "Motorcyclist"

The old bike, all blobby and amorphous with soft edges and shapeless transitions, looks obsolete parked next to the new one. The new shape is distinctly muscular.
Integrated turn signals are housed in stylized, elongated pods, and the tailsection--a simple structure that looks especially dated on the first-gen bike--is now pinched, stretched and shaped into a gorgeous form, set off with strong swage lines that initiate on the tank and continue over the tail. The new 'Busa is aggressive and visually striking in a way the original--which was mostly just strange--never was.

See here: http://www.motorcyclistonline.com/featur...index.html

Just for the record, i like the Gen I rear end, im just biased as i have a Gen II, and they are better! Very Happy

(all a bit of fun people)

Matt.
Reply
#47
I think there's a couple of threads above that are on the money. Susan Boyle's arse end is better! Oh, I can't afford a new one, I have to stick to the 99!
Reply
#48
If you want to go long on the Gen 2

http://www.catalystracingcomposites.com/
Reply
#49
Gen 2 ass for a gen 1

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/01-Suzuki..._500wt_956
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)