Posts: 594
Threads: 37
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation:
64
01-01-2015, 04:38pm
(This post was last modified: 01-01-2015, 04:48pm by Shordy.)
Was out for a good ride with another forum member yesterday when he so kindly made me aware that my rear tyre on my Gen 2 was not the original size, it's a 190/55-17 as opposed to a 50 series.
What's peoples thoughts on the subject as in any real benefit or negatives by changing to this size?
Posts: 1,110
Threads: 79
Joined: Mar 2007
Reputation:
19
01-01-2015, 04:54pm
(This post was last modified: 01-01-2015, 05:05pm by Tony Nitrous.)
I have a 190/55 on both my Busa and B-King,
(King is a 200/50 as stock)
Would have one on my GSX1400 too except
I'm really happy with the 50 profile tyre and 30mm jack up kit
and really don't want to be changing anything at the moment.
All 3 use the same 6" wheel.
Some folk will write a thread full of why its right or wrong
but I personal don't give a flying f@ck.
Its just a case of what the rider wants and what suits him.
Personally I find the different "shape" or profile can have almost
as much effect even when tyres are branded as being the same size.
I've seen several tyres lined up and there was a noticeable difference
even between those that were sold as being the same size.
5% may or may not be noticed but I don't see it as a drama.
Most folk think 5% is a big step as they normally go up or down
from a bald tyre to a brand new one.
Tony.J.
.... on 2nd thoughts....
Its not standard / complianced / legal and your insurance won't cover you.
Take it off immediately!!!
I'll give you my address to post it to ;-) LOL
Posts: 594
Threads: 37
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation:
64
01-01-2015, 05:07pm
(This post was last modified: 01-01-2015, 05:08pm by Shordy.)
Makes sense Tony. Since I've had the bike, I've been constantly surprised about how well it handles contrary to popular opinion, (insert the fridge analogy here), so maybe the tyre has a bit to do with it. It could also be because I'm generally used to riding heaps of shit and riding around their deficiencies.
Anyway I have no complaints...
One thing you didn't mention though Tony is why you run that profile in the first place?
Posts: 310
Threads: 15
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation:
6
I have 190/55 Pilot Super Sport on my Gen 1 which is set up more for fun/track days. My Gen 2 has 190/50 Pilot Road 4's and is set up more for long distance touring. The Gen 1 feels so much lighter into corners I would have thought the whole bike was 10-20kg lighter. I weighed both bikes the other week, the Gen 2 was 254kg and Gen 1 was 255kg, my GSXR750 K5 was 192kg. My opinion is the 190/55 profile is better for the twisties and the 190/50 profile is better for straight line stability.
Glen
Posts: 594
Threads: 37
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation:
64
Cheers Mozzie, I couldn't ask for a more unbiased opinion.....
Posts: 382
Threads: 36
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
29
Aspect ratio? What does that mean? I always thought that it was the depth of your side wall in millimetres? Anyone own a tape measure?
Alias Stu
Growing old happens.
Growing up is a choice!
Posts: 3,686
Threads: 247
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation:
147
On a 190/50 that would make the side walls 95mm plus arc of tyre and that's where the contention is.... Some manufacturers use a higher walled tyre giving a greater radius arc and a different profile even though the tyre numbers are the same.
BATFINK (aka Tony)
GOD gave us a mind to use.........
Suzuki gives us a reason to loose it!!!!
Posts: 3,686
Threads: 247
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation:
147
the tyre number would be funny if it was all metric
190/55-4318
I guess the easiest way to think about it is that the imperial numeral is more a size rather than measurement.. like saying L, XL, XXL
BATFINK (aka Tony)
GOD gave us a mind to use.........
Suzuki gives us a reason to loose it!!!!