I'm not sure how many states have already enacted rules to prevent turning right or u-turns over un-broken central white lines, but they are gearing up for it in WA. As I suspected its one of those "harmonisation of road rules" things. The main roads department is busy making changes so that they can bring in the rule here.
Now at the same time I've noticed that country roads have longer and longer sections being marked with double white un-broken lines. So I dropped a line to our seat-sniffing Transport Minister Buswell asking a few questions. I got a reply from an advisor on his behalf, full of the usual platitudes. One in particular summed up the attitude of these faceless civil servants, which I'll share:
Q: Have you considered reducing white lines on rural roads to only potentially dangerous spots and thereby allowing personal judgement on the safety of an overtaking manouvre based on personal risk assessment?
The answer started off with standard bull about how civil servants (who invaribly commute by bus or train) or scientists (who ride pushies) are better equipped to conduct extensive assessments. It then went on to say:
A: Many drivers, particulalrly the less experienced, can find it difficult to safely check for approaching traffic and judge the speeed at which it is travelling...etc etc
It is not considered apprpriate that such decision be left to the personal judgement of drivers
So all drivers are stupid, but motorcycle riders must be smart as according to this reply the rule doesn't apply to them!
Now at the same time I've noticed that country roads have longer and longer sections being marked with double white un-broken lines. So I dropped a line to our seat-sniffing Transport Minister Buswell asking a few questions. I got a reply from an advisor on his behalf, full of the usual platitudes. One in particular summed up the attitude of these faceless civil servants, which I'll share:
Q: Have you considered reducing white lines on rural roads to only potentially dangerous spots and thereby allowing personal judgement on the safety of an overtaking manouvre based on personal risk assessment?
The answer started off with standard bull about how civil servants (who invaribly commute by bus or train) or scientists (who ride pushies) are better equipped to conduct extensive assessments. It then went on to say:
A: Many drivers, particulalrly the less experienced, can find it difficult to safely check for approaching traffic and judge the speeed at which it is travelling...etc etc
It is not considered apprpriate that such decision be left to the personal judgement of drivers
So all drivers are stupid, but motorcycle riders must be smart as according to this reply the rule doesn't apply to them!
Government certified carpet muncher