Motion Software--Calculators Anybody ?
#1
Here ya go Camel / Spamjam & Pete the OEM ECU Hacker,

http://www.motionsoftware.com/index.html

Thought this might interest you all. About all I've used so far is the Compression Ratio Calculator.

I know you like pictures Camel;

Those EGTs need a trim. I'll just have to trim em up with the Power Commander Pete.
[attachment=8293]

Hope you like my wiring nightmare.
[attachment=8294]
As I'm currently on Bob Carr's Compulsory 3 year starvation period & limited "this could take 5 years budjet", the new YTZ 14S battery had preference to Tathra. Best I finish that stroker motor, OEM conrods-budget, hope they don't break.
Never mind, the Akasaka ME is lookin better & better every day.Pi_thumbsup
Watch out for drunk drivers.
Cheers
[attachment=8295]
Reply
#2
Hope you like my wiring nightmare.

Grunter ............... you could always do away with the 4 EGT's the Power Commander, Shift Controller etc etc etc etc etc lighten the load and simply "FLASH IT"
I wouldn't have thought you could keep the power settings constant long enough for EGT to be of benefit Idiot2
Reply
#3
Well then. It is good to know you can trim the fuel to each individual injector/throttle body (2 x 4) with the ECU hack tool Pete, just like the Power Commander ?
Reply
#4
Cyl 1, 2, 3.--- same EGT.
Cyl 4 ---- about 80 deg F higher. There not trimmed for max power & totally volumetric efficient engine operation. How to trim with the ECU hack tool & no EGT gauges on each pot ? Even from the factory, there is no way knowing each one of those 4 or 8 injectors is spitting out the exact same amount of fuel. Only way of telling is 4 x EGT sensors on each exhaust outlet.
[attachment=8339]

Welcome
Wtf
Reply
#5
Gruntmax, what happened to the photos?

Can't see them!

What about four LSU 4.2 wideband O2 sensors? One per header? That's be better than the EGT.

Speaking of which, anyone used an EGT to determine optimum header length?

Camel
Reply
#6
(08-12-2009, 07:08pm)Camel Wrote: Gruntmax, what happened to the photos?

Can't see them!

What about four LSU 4.2 wideband O2 sensors? One per header? That's be better than the EGT.

Speaking of which, anyone used an EGT to determine optimum header length?

Camel
Photos; they've Re-Flashed the site. Can see them now.Lol2
Reply
#7
That's an awfullly large amount of copper you've got there mate! Gonna need all that extra power to drag the weight around!

As for the additional 80 degrees on # 4 cyl, what was it? Dodgy primary or secondary?

I hear what your saying about EE2's inability to address individual cylinders. Actually it can, but isn't available on the pre-release version. The prelim work was done, but the lads took an easier approach to achieving their objective, (cylinder unification), which given the workload, was the most sensible and affective approach to take.

Where did you source your EGT probes from (K-type?)

Camel
Reply
#8
(12-12-2009, 12:04am)Camel Wrote: That's an awfullly large amount of copper you've got there mate! Gonna need all that extra power to drag the weight around!

As for the additional 80 degrees on # 4 cyl, what was it? Dodgy primary or secondary?

I hear what your saying about EE2's inability to address individual cylinders. Actually it can, but isn't available on the pre-release version. The prelim work was done, but the lads took an easier approach to achieving their objective, (cylinder unification), which given the workload, was the most sensible and affective approach to take.

Where did you source your EGT probes from (K-type?)

Camel
In the USA. Subliminal message sent.
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)